Avoidable Delay in the Trial Courts

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Why Do Courts Delay?

Answering one question often begets another. We present a decision-theoretic model that describes how this dynamic sequences decisions over time. Because answering an easy question may raise a more difficult one, a rational decision-maker may delay resolution even if he has perfect information about the correct decision. Furthermore, because otherwise unrelated questions may raise similar follo...

متن کامل

Avoidable delay in diagnosing bronchial carcinoma.

Prior to 1925 bronchiogenic carcinoma was considered a rare disease. Since that time malignant lesions arising primarily in the tracheobronchial tree have not only increased in number but have been recognized more frequently, as methods for diagnosis have improved. Along with improvements in diagnosis, surgical techniques have been perfected to the point that removal of a lobe of a lung or the ...

متن کامل

Delay Reduction Efforts in Three Juvenile Courts

To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally-funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. The causes of delay in the youth justice system are complex. No single approach is likely to be ef...

متن کامل

Confirmation Delay for Vacancies on the Circuit Courts of Appeals

Supreme Court confirmation is an exhaustively studied phenomenon, but lower court confirmation is less well understood, in part because lower court nominees are very rarely rejected, and the Senate fails even to hold a recorded vote for most appointees. However, the length of time it takes to fill a judicial vacancy serves as alternate evidence of conflict between the president and the Senate. ...

متن کامل

Courts and torts: the psychiatrist preparing for trial.

OBJECTIVE To outline how a psychiatric expert can do an impartial assessment and medicolegal report and then give an effective presentation in court that can sustain cross-examination. METHODS The legal principles of litigating emotional trauma are reviewed, including proving causation, characterizing emotional suffering, assessing disability, and determining a realistic prognosis. RESULTS ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: The Yale Law Journal

سال: 1908

ISSN: 0044-0094

DOI: 10.2307/784478